“The past has been a
mint of pain and sorrow,
that must not be true of tomorrow.”
History by Langston Hughes,
1940
In social studies class, we all
read Langston Hughes’ mainstream poems like A Dream Deferred --
poems filled with measured social criticism and vague, non-threatening
idealism.
What our social studies
teachers neglected to mention was that Langston Hughes spent most of the
1930s churning out poem after poem and play after play unflinchingly
advocating revolution, calling on Blacks and whites to unite worldwide for
the overthrow of capitalism and oppression.
While Hughes insisted that he
was never a member of the Communist Party, poems like Good Morning
Revolution, Goodbye Christ, and Put Another ‘S’ in the
USA (“to make it Soviet”), made his radical convictions
abundantly clear.
Upon returning from the Soviet
Union in 1933, Hughes took up residence in Carmel, California where he
helped organize support for a strike of migrant cotton pickers in the San
Joaquin Valley. It was this
experience that inspired him to begin work on the play HARVEST
(originally under the title BLOOD ON THE COTTON and then BLOOD
ON THE FIELD) in collaboration with white Communist Party activist
Ella Winter.
Outraged by such left-wing
pursuits (and incensed by suggestions of an interracial affair between
Hughes & Winter), a vigilante mob attacked Hughes’ lodgings in
October of ’33. Hughes was
forced to leave the area and Winter withdrew her name from their
co-authored script.
HARVEST was eventually
produced by the radical troupe The Living Newspaper (of which our
playhouse’s namesake Manny Fried was a proud member).
With a gargantuan cast, this documentary play tried to capture
almost every detail of the 1933 Strike (the script calls for over 30
actors – for our rendition, we had to wheedle it down to a more
manageable ensemble of 18).
One of Hughes’ earliest
plays, HARVEST was written with much more concern for issues than
dramatic structure – in fact, the script is filled with typos and
mislabeled character names, even the numerical listing of scenes is out of
sequence!
Inevitably, some literary aficionados will turn up their nose at this play
for its lack of this or that theatrical convention.
But to do so is to miss the
entire point. Langston Hughes
did not write this work to dazzle audiences with his command of dramatic
technique, he wrote it to make a statement on our world and share with us
the struggles of downtrodden people who he knew would be left out of the
history books.
Here at Subversive Theatre, we
take pride in telling the part of the story that social studies teachers
leave out. So we are very
pleased to have this opportunity to present HARVEST as the fourth
installment of our annual “Workers’ Power Play Series”
and do our small part to help reclaim the full legacy of Langston Hughes .
. . as well as the full story of the American Labor Movement!
Kurt Schneiderman.