Director's
Notes for
HARVEST
THIS IS NOT YOUR
FATHER’S LANGSTON HUGHES
“The past
has been a mint of pain and sorrow,
that must not be true of tomorrow.”
History by Langston Hughes, 1940
In
social studies class, we all read Langston Hughes’ mainstream poems like
A Dream Deferred -- poems filled with measured social criticism and
vague, non-threatening idealism.
What
our social studies teachers neglected to mention was that Langston Hughes
spent most of the 1930s churning out poem after poem and play after play
unflinchingly advocating revolution, calling on Blacks and whites to unite
worldwide for the overthrow of capitalism and oppression.
While
Hughes insisted that he was never a member of the Communist Party, poems
like Good Morning Revolution, Goodbye Christ, and Put
Another ‘S’ in the USA (“to make it Soviet”), made his
radical convictions abundantly clear.
Upon
returning from the Soviet Union in 1933, Hughes took up residence in Carmel,
California where he helped organize support for a strike of migrant cotton
pickers in the San Joaquin Valley.
It was this experience that inspired him to begin work on the play HARVEST
(originally under the title BLOOD ON THE COTTON and then BLOOD ON
THE FIELD) in collaboration with white Communist Party activist Ella
Winter.
Outraged
by such left-wing pursuits (and incensed by suggestions of an interracial
affair between Hughes & Winter), a vigilante mob attacked Hughes’
lodgings in October of ’33.
Hughes was forced to leave the area and Winter withdrew her name from
their co-authored script.
HARVEST
was eventually produced by the radical troupe The Living Newspaper
(of which our playhouse’s namesake Manny Fried was a proud member).
With a gargantuan cast, this documentary play tried to capture almost
every detail of the 1933 Strike (the script calls for over 30 actors – for
our rendition, we had to wheedle it down to a more manageable ensemble of
18).
One
of Hughes’ earliest plays, HARVEST was written with much more
concern for issues than dramatic structure – in fact, the script is filled
with typos and mislabeled character names, even the numerical listing of
scenes is out of sequence!
Inevitably, some literary aficionados will turn up their nose at this play
for its lack of this or that theatrical convention.
But
to do so is to miss the entire point.
Langston Hughes did not write this work to dazzle audiences with his
command of dramatic technique, he wrote it to make a statement on our world
and share with us the struggles of downtrodden people who he knew would be
left out of the history books.
Here
at Subversive Theatre, we take pride in telling the part of the story that
social studies teachers leave out.
So we are very pleased to have this opportunity to present HARVEST
as the fourth installment of our annual “Workers’ Power Play
Series” and do our small part to help reclaim the full legacy of
Langston Hughes . . . as well as the full story of the American Labor
Movement!
Kurt
Schneiderman.
|